On Thursday 02 July 2009 19:00:01 Rex Dieter wrote:
Colin J Thomson - G6AVK wrote:
>> may need to add a dep to it somewhere (kdepim?)
> Sounds good to me as kdepim will use Akonadi more and more I guess.
But... as-is, no does not. I'm guessing kdepim may have been the
only item on the kde spin needing akonadi, perhaps, we could get away
with having an akonadi-less spin now.
Bare with me Rex (its been a long day :-) ) your saying kdepim can be
built without Akonadi now?, are you suggesting builds without it.
I would of thought it a good idea to keep it as it evolves (maybe PIM
builds in unstable)
Kmail will heavily depend on it, possibly KDE4.4/4.55 onwards, we all
know about this problem which hopefully Akonadi will sort out:
Fedora (F11 Leonidas)
Registered Linux user number #342953