On Tuesday 20 January 2009 15:38:04 Linuxguy123 wrote:
Well, at least, half way down they do actually get to mention what's there. Meanwhile, http://dot.kde.org/1232445901/ - Linux Format think differently.
Anne
Linuxguy123 wrote:
appears that they cover a lot of what has been posted in this tsl for previous kde 4.x.
at least, they do give a fair review. kde 4 has much to improve before it is as versatile a kde 3.x.
and to say that it is a clone of vista, well i really do not recall all of what i saw of vista on a friend's system, but kde 4 does look a lot like what i saw.
all in all, i hope that kde will wake up and come up with a good desktop again some day and stop coping msbsos.
3 things: - crappy preview (*kuch* one single page) - KDE is not a clone or what so ever (eg. kde had widgets (super karamba) way before windows.) - what GNU philosphy is missing?
Oh well I wasting my bandwith here :) I'm waiting on good reviews with good and helpfull critics....
Linuxguy123 wrote:
http://www.inatux.com/articles/Fedora10withKDE4.2RC
fedora-kde mailing list fedora-kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
Linuxguy123 wrote:
This is just a troll, the "KKK" references are blatant flamebait, it gets basic facts wrong (KDE's desktop effects are NOT Compiz!) and the list of new features is not anywhere near complete.
Kevin Kofler