On Monday, July 19, 2010 15:43:14 Rex Dieter wrote:
Rahul shared some of the same concern that Kevin did about this
recent
change I made.
I have to admit, I share some of the same pragmatic sentiments that
Rahul does (esp in areas where stability/features are even wider, like
with kpackagekit).
Comments?
my gf uses knetworkmanager and she does not care, because does not need to
know there is something like that at all, so knm is enough for her
on the other hand I'm using nm because knm-vpnc bug for askpass and more
importantly because knm vpn is missing feature "ipv4 : routes: [ ] Use this
connection only for resources on its network" which is very important for me
because I don't wont to have "local" internet radio routed twice over the
ocean.
Michal
-- Rex
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Fedora-spins] [spin-kickstarts] +nm-applet
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:33:52 +0530
From: Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com>
To: The Spin Special Interest Group mailing list
<spins(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
CC: Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)fedoraproject.org>
On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> +# provide nm-applet as fallback in cases where knm/nm-plasmoid fails
> +NetworkManager-gnome
I assume this requires manual reconfiguration by the user. Couldn't knm
or nm-plasmoid whichever one is the future for KDE just be fixed to
support everything nm-applet does? If you don't have feature parity,
you should just bite the bullet and continue to include nm-applet by
default and ignore the purity angle. Including both is not the right
approach IMO.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from
http://userbase.kde.org