Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.09.2015 um 17:46 schrieb Eric Griffith:
> On Sep 15, 2015 11:01 AM, "Emilio Recio"
> <Emilio.Recio(a)jefferson.edu
> <mailto:Emilio.Recio@jefferson.edu>> wrote:
> >
> > But the point that I am trying to make is that KF5 should have
> > provided for a transitional phase for developers. Both side-by-side.
> >
> > Further, what is the argument for the new standard. The only thing I
> > read was "you can make your icons prettier and in the right size".
> > This is not an excuse for removing basic functionality,
>
> There is also the fact that the xembed specification had thumbnails
> hardcoded to a specific size (22px by 22px) which was making them look
> like crap on even my 1080p monitor, let alone 4k ones
well, i prefer something looking like crap when the other option is
don#t have it at all
And... now we've come full circle, you have a "looking like crap" option,
use wmsystemtray
-- rex