On 05/12/2015 05:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/13/15 07:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 00:26 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> If, and I say if since I've not tested, this fixes the session
>>> restore issues of Plasma 5 then to me it is a *must* for F22
> Session restore doesn't seem like a great FE candidate, since people
> don't usually use sessions on live images. Post-install issues like
> that can be handled fine with updates; the update will be available as
> a 0-day if karma'ed.
I suppose I may have mis-understood the question. As I didn't read this as being
"live image" centric.
I generally don't use/test the Live images all that much. But, if folks use the Live
images as a way of deciding if they will use the release and if the Live image supports
logging out/in.....then I still feel it is a must.
The reason it is critical for release is because we don't release
updates for the live images - once shipped, that's it.
One question. Would a netinstall eliminate the need to install and
then update to get the fix?
If you did a netinstall with the updates repo enabled, then yes it would
be a one step process. But even a two step - install then update, is
acceptable since we expect people to be applying updates regularly.
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com