Finally.... Someone gets the idea... Make sure the old stuff works before
moving on to the new stuff
Yay!!!!
On Tuesday 15 September 2015 19:44:09 Reindl Harald wrote:
here you go:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233017
"Ksystraycmd won't work in Plasma 5, because it still uses the legacy
XEmbed protocol" - well, a developers homework is to port first his own
stuff *before* blame others that they need to switch and change something
Am 15.09.2015 um 19:42 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 15.09.2015 um 19:30 schrieb Emilio Recio:
>> Hrm... odd on how you can still "Place in System Tray" checkbox in
the
>> Advanced Options for creating a link to application... but then I get
>> the error:
>>
>> KDEInit could not launch 'ksystraycmd':
>> Could not open library '/usr/lib/libkdeinit5_ksystraycmd'.
>> Cannot load library /usr/lib/libkdeinit5_ksystraycmd:
>> (/usr/lib/libkdeinit5_ksystraycmd.so: cannot open shared object file: No
>> such file or directory)
>>
>> I don't know if it's a fedora thing or KDE thing...
>
> a KDE thing, ksystraycmd was not ported to KF5 until now while the UI
> does nothing else at put it in the .desktop file as result using that
> checkbox, the same happens for anything which had the setting already
>
> KF5 is at best pre-beta quality and the Fedora kde SIG honestly should
> have realized that *before* throw it to long years users - i still seek
> for any user visible improvement and have not found a single one
>
>> On 09/15/15 11:57, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> Am 15.09.2015 um 17:46 schrieb Eric Griffith:
>>>>> On Sep 15, 2015 11:01 AM, "Emilio Recio"
>>>>> <Emilio.Recio(a)jefferson.edu
>>>>>
>>>>> <mailto:Emilio.Recio@jefferson.edu>> wrote:
>>>>> > But the point that I am trying to make is that KF5 should
have
>>>>> > provided for a transitional phase for developers. Both
>>>>>
>>>>> side-by-side.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Further, what is the argument for the new standard. The only
>>>>>
>>>>> thing I
>>>>>
>>>>> > read was "you can make your icons prettier and in the
right size".
>>>>> > This is not an excuse for removing basic functionality,
>>>>>
>>>>> There is also the fact that the xembed specification had thumbnails
>>>>> hardcoded to a specific size (22px by 22px) which was making them
look
>>>>> like crap on even my 1080p monitor, let alone 4k ones
>>>>
>>>> well, i prefer something looking like crap when the other option is
>>>> don#t have it at all
>>>
>>> And... now we've come full circle, you have a "looking like
crap"
>>> option,
>>> use wmsystemtray
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.