On 10/20/2013 10:52 AM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
> From a user's point of view, Qt 5 is not a drop-in replacement
> for Qt 4
That's too bad :-(
It's not bad, but a good thing imo. Qt4/Qt5 is much like Qt3/Qt4 and
gtk2/gtk3, they are different parallel-installable toolkits.
The good news is that api-wise Qt5 is relatively close to Qt4, so
projects that want to use it generally dont have to change their code
much (provided they weren't using any compat or deprecated interfaces).