On Friday 19 March 2010 12:10:14 Thomas Janssen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Neal Becker
<ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> OK, second time I tried to report a bug. It's not
me.
>>>
>>> After putting a sentence explaining what I was doing before the crash,
>>> I get a dialog asking if I can tell some more. I choose no. Then my
>>> only choice is quit of save the information - not send it in. And, if
>>> I pick save, and then I see it means save to a file, and I cancel, the
>>> whole thing just quits. This is exactly what happened the last time.
>>> Really frustrating that I spent all the effort to download debuginfo,
>>> check dups, and it was a complete waste of time.
>>
>> Means the information given wasn't enough for a good bugreport. The
>> first sentence is kinda a header telling the general problem. The
>> second (you said no) is where to give more information/telling what
>> you did. Without that information (tell some more) it's not a useful
>> bugreport. The behavior changed lately. Sending old style bugreports,
>> without further information isn't possible any more AFAIK.
>
> It should warn the user that if they say 'no, they can't give more
info'
> that it will close without sending the report!
Agreed.
Last time I saw it, it actually said if the bug report itself wasn't useful,
and offered to download debug packages to improve matters. That was only a
couple of days ago. Are you saying this isn't so any more?
Anne
--
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from
http://userbase.kde.org