But the point that I am trying to make is that KF5 should have provided
for a transitional phase for developers. Both side-by-side.
Further, what is the argument for the new standard. The only thing I
read was "you can make your icons prettier and in the right size". This
is not an excuse for removing basic functionality,
-e
On 09/15/15 10:52, Rex Dieter wrote:
Of course it's lame. lame is better than nothing.
Application developers have known (or should have known) for years now that classic
xembed systray was deprecated and would be going away soon, and that they should support
the newer status-notifier-based standards (or move away from systray icons altogether).
-- Rex
________________________________________
From: kde-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <kde-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> on
behalf of Emilio Recio <Emilio.Recio(a)jefferson.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:43 AM
To: KDE on Fedora discussion
Subject: Re: F22 / KDE5
I tried that, and it is lame. (Personal opinion) All of my apps
(audacious, pidgin, davmail - java apps, etc.) just don't dock anymore,
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from
http://userbase.kde.org
The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and confidential
information. It is intended only for the use of the person named above. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution
or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
message.
CAUTION: Intended recipients should NOT use email communication for emergent or urgent
health care matters.