On Aug 7, 2015 9:43 AM, "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
> Some of my points were:
> 1) Almost dead upstream for Konq, vs thriving upstream for Firefox, Konq
> may have undiscovered security vulnerabilities, but the limited number
> users is hiding them.
The limited number of users also means nobody will be targeting Konqueror
with attacks. IMHO, this is actually an advantage.
"Security through irrelevancy" isn't exactly a convincing argument..
A non-KDE browser will NEVER be an option for a KDE spin no matter how
you ask for it.
Isn't that for the vote to decide, Kevin? Hence, you know, the vote? We
wouldn't be the first distro to decide that a "pure" KDE experience
in the best interests of the users.
kde mailing list
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org