On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Monday 08 March 2010 21:46:38 Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> wrote:
> > One more call for discussion around another proposal that came out of
> > FUDCon Toronto. Short version of this is that we'd consider slowing
> > down updates a step, esp for the second half of a fedora release's
> > lifetime, and to limit kde 4.x-type upgrades to at most 1 per release.
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Stability_Proposal
> > Whatever we decide, increasing our transparency by documenting our update
> > practices will hopefully help shape everyone''s plans and expectations.
> > As it is, seems these vary wildly.
> What will that mean for people like myself looking for little bug
Great opportunity for junior developers to backport/fix small issues ;-)
So then this may actually involve more work? I like Fedora's fast pace
(though recently slowing) nature. I'd be happy to endorse this if it
meant less work for the KDE team.