On 06/30/2011 09:17 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> right - and the default (I believe) for google-chrome is to use its
> own - which is DE independent :-)
and the worst solution
i wonder that there was no common used solution on unix-like systems
the past ten years to avoid such problems in the future
A library of tools is a good solution - but YAD (yet another
daemon)with inadequate service is not (e.g. seahorse).
Its also not terribly hard to do - so the need to use a common one is
pretty low - but would be convenient if they all used the same database
store (and have choices what the store is - at least for the local
storage - for remote store (which chrome also uses) - the issues are a
little different).
Perhaps a clear definition of the goals, needs and how UIs work - and
how the common applications could use this API and benefit would be
helpful to would be tool builders.
gene/