On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 02:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
> > Some of my points were:
> >
> > 1) Almost dead upstream for Konq, vs thriving upstream for
> > Firefox, Konq
> > may have undiscovered security vulnerabilities, but the limited
> > number of
> > users is hiding them.
>
> The limited number of users also means nobody will be targeting
> Konqueror
> with attacks. IMHO, this is actually an advantage.
PS: A Firefox 0-day exploited in the wild:
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2015/08/06/firefox-exploit-found-in
-the-wild/
Do we really want to expose our users to such risks?
Up to now I had a neutral view in this discussion (I'm not against
Konqueror though I don't use it), but I'm afraid that remark is making
me think again, perhaps not in the way you intended.
poc