Felix Miata wrote:
Rex Dieter composed on 2016-03-11 13:13 (UTC-0600):
> I am considering finally EOL'ing kdm in time for fedora 24, anyone still
> interested in keeping it alive?
I can't be a maintainer, but as it's the only DM I'm aware of that
provides required functionality, I hope it need not be retired before
something provides functionality equivalent to it.
OK, I'll bite. What counts as "required functionality" for you?
In particular, what's missing from other dm's (sddm in particular)?