On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:07:56 +0300, Eli Wapniarski
<eli(a)orbsky.homelinux.org> wrote:
On Monday 15 June 2009 15:09:10 Eelko Berkenpies wrote:
>
> On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:48:14 -0400, Ben Boeckel <MathStuf(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Eelko Berkenpies wrote:
> >
> >> There is being worked on one;
http://rekonq.sourceforge.net/
> >>
> >> I don't know if it will be a default browser but it makes an
> > good
> >> alternative for Konqueror anyway. :)
> >>
> >> I'm working on getting it properly packaged for Fedora. I got
> > an older
> >> package wrapped up here:
http://berkenpies.nl/rekonq/ (spec
> > needs work for
> >> the new version, 0.1.0, and I have to make sure I got
> > everything covered
> >> for review). The plan is to get it in to review before the
> > end of next
> >> week.
> > We'll see how it goes. I'm not holding by breath for these
> > Konqueror replacements. The project making the KPart to get
> > WebKit integration is the one that, IMO, is Doing It Right
> > instead of making a new browser from scratch.
> >
> > - --Ben
>
> Alright, I managed to wrap things up (a bit later as expected though).
> But
> hey, better late then never they say. :)
>
> I've packaged rekonq 0.1.0 for F11 and F12/rawhide. It should pretty
much
> comply with the Package Guidelines and I'll submit it for
review later.
> Although I'd appreciate it if someone could check it out if they are
> interested in a small, nifty, KDE4 browser.
>
> Fedora 11:
>
http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F11/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm
>
> Rawhide:
>
http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F12/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc12.i586.rpm
>
> Everything (spec / sources / rpms):
>
http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/
>
>
Unfortunately I will not have the time to review. However, I have just
rebuilt the package of f11 x86_64. For an alpha version it certainly is
promising, but there are still an awful lot of rough spots.
The effort is very much appreciated
Eli
Thanks for having a look at it. The fact that it looks promising drew my
attention too. As far as I know some of the issues have been polished
already and a new version might be released soon. 0.1.2 is in the current
development GIT repository.
<shameless ad> The review request is now up at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 </shameless ad>
--
Met vriendelijke groet / With kind regards,
Eelko Berkenpies