On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 10:32 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2010/2/18 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at>:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> 1) using "... update kde*" will also pull in any dependencies that
>> needs from updates-testing, so you don't need anything else.
> Not necessarily, sometimes it misses some stuff.
>> 2) not restricting yourself to kde* (and its dependencies) increases the
>> risk of a flaky system because you're updating a bunch of stuff you
>> don't care about. It can then be hard to back out to *not* using
>> updates-testing for every future update.
> But this is true.
Quite interesting. What's true there? The risk of a flaky system?
Yeah, that can happen. But that happens as well with updates from
Please re-read my original reply. I said it *increases* the risk of a
flaky system. Kevin appears to agree.
And you think it's true that you cant back out and stop using
updates-testing because you used it once?
Ditto. I didn't say that either.