On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Linuxguy123 <linuxguy123(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:09 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> >> The 64bit flash without nspluginwrapper is more resource friendly here.
> >> > video is nvidia proprietary (rpmfusion).
> >> Well, that's a problem.
> > We've seen various people on this list blame the proprietary nvidia
> > driver for various problems before and it hasn't turned out to be the
> > issue. What proof do you have ?
> And we had enough flame posts about it on the different fedora-* lists
> Not going to have another one.
> I think you know the problems of a closed source driver. If not, it is
> not supported by us.
Could you please smear the closed source driver a bit more ? Just
because its closed source doesn't mean its bad.
So what if its not supported by "us". Maybe the problem isn't in the
closed source driver. Maybe its in a, gulp, Fedora component ! Have
you even looked ?
What's the real problem? You think you have to fight something
personal with me? Then simply tell me what.
Closed source drivers aren't supported by us == Fedora. It counts for
any closed source software.
If you think that isn't right, go on and change it.
Dubium sapientiae initium