On Aug 1, 2015 14:02, "Markus Slopianka" <kamikazow(a)gmx.de> wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2015 08:58:44 Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> But moving back from the lurch into the pedantic, my point was that it's
> extremely
> easy to install and use whatever applications you want - and if you're
> unhappy with
> the performance or capabilities of an application, that should be
discussed
> upstream.
QtWebKit and KHTML are both unmaintained and insecure.
I find it absolutely puzzling that some here argue for insecure defaults
for
web browsers but opening a few ports to make KDE Connect work out of
the
box
is apparently out of the question security-wise...
Why are insecure and unmaintained browsers even on the table as defaults?
I don't know... as I suggested above, why don't you ask upstream.