On 03/29/14 15:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
> g wrote:
>
>> yet, in reality, my point, which one missed, is that when it
>> comes to web browsers and email clients, it is like
>> baskin-robbins, there are many choices to make and that choice
>> should be left to user. not packages that are loaded by default
>> when a new installation is made.
>
> Thanks, but I think it's a given that we need to install one web
> browser by default, and that the question is which one. Not
> installing any (or some how providing a choice) is not an option
> we are considering.
is linux not all about _choice_. ;-)
On the other hand, we *could* move the webbrowser outside of
treating it as part of the desktop environment, and more as an
(essential) addon application.
that could be a better way. and, "even mo betta" if it where set up
to give user/installer a _choice_ as to which browser.
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
tc.hago.
g
.