On Wednesday 04 February 2009 10:40:20 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:37:25 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:22:38 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > > Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > > > > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed
> > > > > > and after they pass I can ask for sponsorship.
> > > > >
> > > > > Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually
> > > > > your sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and
> > > > > once most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give
> > > > > things a final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring
> > > > > you.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because
> > > > later we can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es
> > > > kio_sysinfo review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we
> > > > have package in good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really
> > > > easy to review but the second one brings again flags issue :(
> > > >
> > > > Jaroslav
> > > >
> > > > > Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we
> > > > > could even forgo the wait on reviews.
> > >
> > > I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be
> > > sponsored are not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other
> > > than where there are a list of sponsores.
> >
> > Just wondering if I got this right... I added "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" to the
> > blocks field. Is that right?
>
> Don't hurry :-)
> Review is on beginning! There are several other rules to be checked and
> then we have to wait for Rex or Kevin, I can't sponsor you. In this case
> you don't need to set FE-NEEDSPONSOR because we can sponsor you.
>
> Ok, I'm going to finish review, you're lucky - some packages can wait years
> for it :D
>


Thanks Jaroslav


Eli



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.