On 02/25/2010 05:13 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:21 PM,
Linuxguy123<linuxguy123(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 20:09 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> The 64bit flash without nspluginwrapper is more resource friendly here.
>>>>
>>>>> video is nvidia proprietary (rpmfusion).
>>>>
>>>> Well, that's a problem.
>>>
>>> We've seen various people on this list blame the proprietary nvidia
>>> driver for various problems before and it hasn't turned out to be the
>>> issue. What proof do you have ?
>>
>> And we had enough flame posts about it on the different fedora-* lists
>> Not going to have another one.
>> I think you know the problems of a closed source driver. If not, it is
>> not supported by us.
>
> Could you please smear the closed source driver a bit more ? Just
> because its closed source doesn't mean its bad.
>
> So what if its not supported by "us". Maybe the problem isn't in the
> closed source driver. Maybe its in a, gulp, Fedora component ! Have
> you even looked ?
What's the real problem? You think you have to fight something
personal with me? Then simply tell me what.
Closed source drivers aren't supported by us == Fedora. It counts for
any closed source software.
If you think that isn't right, go on and change it.
I think what he is saying is that not every bug found by a user running
the Nvidia proprietary driver is necessarily an Nvidia bug.