Why does the 70mbs even matter? We're no where near the 4.7mb limit of a DVD, nor even the 4GB limit of the smallest USB I can find. Going for what the user is (more likely) familiar with and knows is much more user friendly than going with something they don't just because Konqueror happens to be the default upstream. That's even ignoring the dead project issue both Rekonq and Konq face.

On Jul 28, 2015 9:59 AM, "Mustafa Muhammad" <mustafaa.alhamdaani@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:
>
> Am 28.07.2015 um 15:48 schrieb Mustafa Muhammad:
>>
>> I don't want two browsers, but you refuse to change the default from
>> an almost dead upstream browser that is slow, doesn't support latest
>> HTML well (and likely will not), does not support addons, to the
>> second most popular desktop browser that is actively developed.
>> I want it as and option to your default because this is better for
>> Fedora and especially to the new users
>
>
> i do not refuse anything because i am just a user as you but i have zero
> understanding for bloated default installs
>
> "Browse the web without YouTube" is as ridiculous as "Add 70MB" because FF
> currently has 123 MB installed size not counting the GTK crosss-dependencies
> on a QT based desktop

Adding only 70MB to the iso, try to install Firefox on a fresh Fedora KDE.

>
> a user which wants to use Firefox can install it as well as a user needs to
> install other applications since you can't pack the whole distribution in a
> default setup - period
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
_______________________________________________
kde mailing list
kde@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org