Am 2020-06-23 20:23, schrieb Neal Gompa:
I'm interested in hearing about your feedback on the change
proposal.
I am excited about this, personally, as I think there's some serious
opportunity to collaborate with KDE upstream and our friends at
openSUSE on taking advantage of Btrfs features to make a smoother
experience.
Please don't. I've been using btrfs for several years now and really
like how it has developed and would recommend it to users who know what
they are doing. The problem I have with this proposal is at times when
btrfs breaks and you have to search the btrfs mailing lists for
solutions and have to ask some developers to do some wild stuff to get
it running again. You simply don't want to tell users that they have to
rebuild the extent tree or things like this. That's what happened to me
when btrfs introduced a new extent tree checker(?) in 5.4 (IIRC) – _I_
can fix stuff like this, beginners may not be able to do so.