Am 03.08.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Mustafa Muhammad:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Gerald B. Cox <gbcox(a)bzb.us
<mailto:gbcox@bzb.us>> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Markus Slopianka <kamikazow(a)gmx.de
<mailto:kamikazow@gmx.de>> wrote:
Don't play dumb.
No browser using a deprecated, insecure engine should ever be
default.
There is no excuse to do it anyway.
That's why I suggested you question upstream. They are still
referencing Konqueror as a key
application, and it's their default browser.
"If" it is their default, it doesn't need to be our default, if we let a
"deprecated, insecure engine" based browser be our default, we are
betraying our users.
the next time you are repeating this post a link with CVE's or just
refrain to repeat it - NO not a CVE for a random fork of the engine
which may or may not have the same bugs
until then try to understand that maybe one of the features you are
missing that bad introduced a CVE which is not present
and finally: LEAVE ME IN PEACE with the broken idea ship GTK/GNOME apps
with a KDE live-image which results in BLOATWARE in case you create a
live usb-stick with rw-overlay