I come from Plasma archlinux which has no kf5 dependencies why are there some in fedora :
dnf remove kf5*
Removing dependent packages:
plasma-breeze x86_64 6.2.2-1.fc42 rawhide
plasma-desktop x86_64 6.2.2 -1.fc42 rawhide
plasma-print-manager x86_64 6.2.2-1.fc42 rawhide
plasma-workspace x86_64 6.2.2-1.fc42 rawhide
plasma-workspace-wayland x86_64 6.2.2-1.fc42 rawhide
plasma-workspace-x11 x86_64 6.2.2-1.fc42 rawhide
sddm-breeze
Hi folks,
we have published a release criteria change proposal at Fedora Discussion:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-limit-release-blocking-stat…
This is a notification to make sure everybody can see it and post feedback,
even when not watching Fedora Discussion regularly.
When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in
through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead
of having it split between multiple places. Thank you.
Kamil Paral
Fedora Quality
Hi folks,
we have published a release criteria change proposal at Fedora Discussion:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-drop-optical-media-boot-rel…
This is a notification to make sure everybody can see it and post feedback,
even when not watching Fedora Discussion regularly.
When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in
through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead
of having it split between multiple places. Thank you.
Kamil Paral
Fedora Quality
Hi folks,
we have published a release criteria change proposal at Fedora Discussion:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-drop-intel-based-macbook-du…
This is a notification to make sure everybody can see it and post feedback,
even when not watching Fedora Discussion regularly.
When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in
through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead
of having it split between multiple places. Thank you.
Kamil Paral
Fedora Quality
Seeing problem
~# kinfocenter
kf.kirigami.platform: Failed to find a Kirigami platform plugin for
style "Fusion"
qt.svg.draw: The requested buffer size is too big, ignoring
qt.svg.draw: The requested buffer size is too big, ignoring
There is historical discussion from 2024 that was supposed to be fixed
in the plasma-integration module. Installed rpms
plasma-integration.x86_64 6.4.3-1.fc42
plasma-integration-qt5.x86_64 6.4.3-1.fc42
Hi,
I am reporting this here.
When using the kde-beta copr, in Fedora 42, there is a dependency issue
described in the attached file.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio Matos
Hi folks,
we have published a release criteria change proposal at Fedora Discussion:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-no-longer-block-releases-on…
This is a notification to make sure everybody can see it and post feedback,
even when not watching Fedora Discussion regularly.
When replying, **please**, reply to the Discussion topic. Logging in
through FAS is trivial. We want a unified discussion in one place, instead
of having it split between multiple places. Thank you.
Kamil Paral
Fedora Quality
Starting kinfocenter in a window gives the messages
~# kinfocenter
kf.kirigami.platform: Failed to find a Kirigami platform plugin for
style "Fusion"
qt.svg.draw: The requested buffer size is too big, ignoring
qt.svg.draw: The requested buffer size is too big, ignoring
This leads to two questions
What does the reference to kf.kirigami.platform mean?
There should be plenty of room for buffers with 32G memory and 2T drive
space.
I noticed recently that each time I send an email to the kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list I get up to three failed DMARC reports from other email servers.
The list is sending email "from" me with the source address:
Source-IP: 38.145.60.11 (bastion-iad01.fedoraproject.org)
Which, of course, does not match up with my email server's IP address, so SPF fails, It also appears that DKIM signature also does not match.
I've had my server's DNS set up to request DMARK failure reports for a few years and haven't seen any reports lately except via this list. So I am wondering if something is mis-configured on this list server.
Emmett