https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
Bug ID: 1111502 Summary: Build with $RPM_OPT/LD_FLAGS, show native build output Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: netty Assignee: mizdebsk@redhat.com Reporter: ville.skytta@iki.fi QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org, jerboaa@gmail.com, jon.vanalten@redhat.com, mizdebsk@redhat.com, msimacek@redhat.com, msrb@redhat.com
I wonder if it's possible to additionally package the native lib outside of a jar so a proper debuginfo package could be created?
Anyway if not I suppose this leaves the *.so containing debug symbols inside the jar and thus that one can be used for debugging. If so, the -debuginfo package should be disabled.
'git am'able fix attached (sans disabling the -debuginfo part). While at it, fixed one bogus date in %changelog.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
--- Comment #1 from Ville Skyttä ville.skytta@iki.fi --- Created attachment 910675 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=910675&action=edit Build with $RPM_OPT/LD_FLAGS, show native build output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com --- (In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #0)
I wonder if it's possible to additionally package the native lib outside of a jar so a proper debuginfo package could be created?
This is a generic problem with Java packaging. I believe that it's better to extend debuginfo gererators to look into JARs for DSO to strip them and generate proper debuginfo.
Anyway if not I suppose this leaves the *.so containing debug symbols inside the jar and thus that one can be used for debugging. If so, the -debuginfo package should be disabled.
'git am'able fix attached (sans disabling the -debuginfo part). While at it, fixed one bogus date in %changelog.
Thanks for the patch, I'll apply it. I will disable debuginfo pagkages too, as they are empty anyways.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|mizdebsk@redhat.com |jerboaa@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sgehwolf@redhat.com Version|22 |rawhide Assignee|jerboaa@gmail.com |sgehwolf@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |netty-4.0.28-1.fc23, | |netty-4.0.28-1.fc22 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2015-05-21 05:16:47
--- Comment #5 from Severin Gehwolf sgehwolf@redhat.com --- Fixed in rawhide, F22. Thanks for the patch! Debug infos are disabled now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- netty-4.0.28-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netty-4.0.28-1.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- netty-4.0.28-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netty-4.0.28-1.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|netty-4.0.28-1.fc23, |netty-4.0.28-1.fc22 |netty-4.0.28-1.fc22 | Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- netty-4.0.28-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111502
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|netty-4.0.28-1.fc22 |netty-4.0.28-1.fc21
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- netty-4.0.28-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org