https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
Bug ID: 1245152 Summary: sbt: Update to version 0.13.8 or newer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: sbt Keywords: FutureFeature Assignee: willb@redhat.com Reporter: mizdebsk@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org, s@shk.io, willb@redhat.com
Description of problem: Please update to upstream version 0.13.8 or newer.
sbt 0.13.8 adds an extension point in the dependency resolution to customize Maven resolvers, which will make writing XMvn extension easier. For more info, see upstream release notes: https://github.com/sbt/sbt/releases/tag/v0.13.8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version| |0.13.1-8 Assignee|willb@redhat.com |mizdebsk@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com --- Fixed in sbt-0.13.1-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEW Fixed In Version|0.13.1-8 | Assignee|mizdebsk@redhat.com |willb@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizdebsk@redhat.com --- Bug status was changed by mistake. Reverting.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |puntogil@libero.it Summary|sbt: Update to version |sbt: Update to version |0.13.8 or newer |0.13.9 or newer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com --- ping?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |demetriobenour@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- *** Bug 1419706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- *** Bug 1419705 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |demetriobenour@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- *** Bug 1419706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- *** Bug 1419705 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|sbt: Update to version |sbt: Update to version |0.13.9 or newer |0.13.13 or newer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
mckinley.olsen@octanner.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mckinley.olsen@octanner.com
--- Comment #6 from mckinley.olsen@octanner.com --- The version available is more than 3 years old (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sbt-dev/6NnViSBoHIg/discussion)
Is there a reason this cannot be updated?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- (In reply to mckinley.olsen from comment #6)
The version available is more than 3 years old (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sbt-dev/6NnViSBoHIg/discussion)
Is there a reason this cannot be updated?
scala 2.9.x vs 2.1x.x incompatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
Timothée Floure fnux@fnux.ch changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fnux@fnux.ch
--- Comment #8 from Timothée Floure fnux@fnux.ch --- Upstream version is now 1.0.2... while the current version in fedora is the 0.13.1 (on 10 Dec 2013 !). This package is clearly outdated. Can't we do something about it ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
Tomáš Nechutný nechtom@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nechtom@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from Tomáš Nechutný nechtom@gmail.com --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #7)
(In reply to mckinley.olsen from comment #6)
The version available is more than 3 years old (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sbt-dev/6NnViSBoHIg/discussion)
Is there a reason this cannot be updated?
scala 2.9.x vs 2.1x.x incompatibility
Does Scala 2.9.x still matter in 2018? sbt is 1.1.4 now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
coomber.harry@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |coomber.harry@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from coomber.harry@gmail.com --- Trying to compile some scala projects fails at the moment fails. See https://github.com/sbt/sbt/issues/1592. At the very least can there be a separate package for sbt 1+?
As an example for a failure of compilation, clone https://github.com/scala/scala/ and run sbt.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
--- Comment #11 from Timothée Floure timothee.floure@fnux.ch --- I am willing to lend a hand but I'd like to hear from the maintainer first. I just sent him a message on IRC.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
--- Comment #12 from coomber.harry@gmail.com --- FWIW installing sbt via the instructions at https://www.scala-sbt.org/download.html works fine, so updating would fix the current issues. It may break existing projects in old versions of scala from what I've read above though.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
--- Comment #13 from Timothée Floure timothee.floure@fnux.ch --- Last time I took a look to the package from scala-sbt.org, it was just packaging the precompiled binaries and did not even put them in the right place.
I successfully contacted willb via IRC but still have to discuss the challenges of packaging sbt with him. I'd like to do this on a public channel (rhbz, a fedora mailing list, fedora wiki, ...).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
Xavier Bachelot xavier@bachelot.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier@bachelot.org
--- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot xavier@bachelot.org --- Any progress on updating sbt to a recent and more useful version ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245152
--- Comment #15 from Timothée Floure timothee.floure@fnux.ch --- We didn't found the time to work on it, but I am still around and willing to help. willb already has some work-in-progress, it would be useful to post it on this bug.
java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com -
Red Hat Bugzilla