https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256390
Michael Simacek <msimacek(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek <msimacek(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #0)
1) fedora-review should be looking for a BR/R on javapackages-tools,
not
jpackage-utils
Addressed in upstream commit b232fe0fe222e2d08c73666772bcd11ad8db3843. Now it's
looking for both.
2) fedora-review could also complain if a BR/R for jpackage-utils is
found,
and recommend it is replaced with javapackages-tools
Not now, the automated tools were switched to generate requires on
javapackages-tools quite recently, we need some transitional period. I see
nothing wrong with using the old provide, it is not going away anytime soon and
doesn't do any harm.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1AgbJgcUlV&a=cc_unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
java-sig-commits mailing list
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/java-sig-commits@lists.fedorapro...