https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2501971
Bug ID: 2501971
Summary: Please branch and build maven-doxia in epel10
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: maven-doxia
Assignee: loganjerry(a)gmail.com
Reporter: kkeithle(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
loganjerry(a)gmail.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, mkoncek(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build maven-doxia in epel10.
If you do not wish to maintain maven-doxia in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS: kkeithle);
please add me through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maven-doxia/adduser
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2501971
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451513
Bug ID: 2451513
Summary: CVE-2025-67030 plexus-components-pom: Plexus-utils:
Directory Traversal in extractFile method [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel10
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["290761a4-33f3-45f9-a327-eab3c64ae31b"]}
Component: plexus-components-pom
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name
Reporter: jmoroney(a)redhat.com
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
michel(a)michel-slm.name, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
mkoncek(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2451409
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451513
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451514
Bug ID: 2451514
Summary: CVE-2025-67030 xbean: Plexus-utils: Directory
Traversal in extractFile method [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel10
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["290761a4-33f3-45f9-a327-eab3c64ae31b"]}
Component: xbean
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: high
Priority: high
Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name
Reporter: jmoroney(a)redhat.com
CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
michel(a)michel-slm.name, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
mkoncek(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2451409
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451514
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719748
Bug ID: 1719748
Summary: jetty-9.4.19.v20190610 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: jetty
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mat.booth(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eclipse-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jjohnstn(a)redhat.com, krzysztof.daniel(a)gmail.com,
mat.booth(a)redhat.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
sochotni(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 9.4.19.v20190610
Current version/release in rawhide: 9.4.18-2.v20190429.fc31
URL: http://www.eclipse.org/jetty
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/1447/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358788
Bug ID: 2358788
Summary: lucene-10.2.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: lucene
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: mkoncek(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, eclipse-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jerboaa(a)gmail.com, mkoncek(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 10.2.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 10.2.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 10.1.0-3.fc42
URL: http://lucene.apache.org/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7178/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lucene
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358788
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543944
Bug ID: 2543944
Summary: CVE-2026-94052 apache-sshd: Apache MINA SSHD: LDAP
password authentication ineffective [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["84954d5f-058a-4775-89b6-70a4b4fbc064"]}
Component: apache-sshd
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: urgent
Priority: urgent
Assignee: mat.booth(a)gmail.com
Reporter: cbuissar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mat.booth(a)gmail.com, msrb(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2543852
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
A missing check in LdapPasswordAuthenticator in component sshd-ldap in Apache
MINA SSHD versions 1.2.0 to 2.19.0 or 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5 bypassed
authentication checks.
Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH. The
optional sshd-ldap component provides support for integrating password and
publickey authentication on the server side with an LDAP server.
sshd-ldap is an optional component. SSH servers implemented with Apache MINA
SSHD are affected only if they use sshd-ldap and do configure an
LdapPasswordAuthenticator to be used for password authentication. Normal
password authentication via the built-in mechanisms in sshd-core is _not_
affected by this vulnerability, which concerns only LdapPasswordAuthenticator.
Users are recommended to upgrade affected applications to version 2.20.0 or
3.0.0-M6, which fix this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543944
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543932
Bug ID: 2543932
Summary: CVE-2026-94053 apache-sshd: Apache MINA SSHD: LDAP
injection in sshd-ldap [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["34847928-320f-4b72-84f1-a25970e7b616"]}
Component: apache-sshd
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: urgent
Priority: urgent
Assignee: mat.booth(a)gmail.com
Reporter: cbuissar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mat.booth(a)gmail.com, msrb(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2543863
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
Authentication bypass via LDAP injection in component sshd-ldap in Apache MINA
SSHD versions 1.2.0 to 2.19.0 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5.
Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH.
The optional sshd-ldap component provides support for integrating
password and publickey authentication on the server side with an LDAP
server.
sshd-ldap is an optional component. SSH servers implemented with Apache
MINA SSHD are affected only if they use sshd-ldap and do configure it to be
used for password of public key authentication.
Other Apache MINA SSHD servers are not affected.
Lack of escaping LDAP filter metacharacters enabled successful authentication
with username "*" and password "*".
Users are recommended to upgrade affected applications to version 2.20.0 or
3.0.0-M6, which fix this issue by properly escaping filter parameters according
to RFC 4515.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543932
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…