[Bug 958221] New: plexus-utils: directory traversal in org.codehaus.plexus.util.Expand
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958221
Bug ID: 958221
Summary: plexus-utils: directory traversal in
org.codehaus.plexus.util.Expand
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: plexus-utils
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: fnasser(a)redhat.com
Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fnasser(a)redhat.com,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 958220
Category: ---
org.codehaus.plexus.util.Expand does not guard against directory traversal, but
such protection is generally expected from unarchiving tools.
I think the class should just be deprecated and removed because there do not
appear to be any users left (not even a test case).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hp1lhU9LQd&a=cc_unsubscribe
6 years, 10 months
[Bug 1004916] New: Package doesn't provide a sysvinit script or systemd service unit
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004916
Bug ID: 1004916
Summary: Package doesn't provide a sysvinit script or systemd
service unit
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: activemq
Severity: high
Assignee: mspaulding06(a)gmail.com
Reporter: skottler(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: agrimm(a)redhat.com,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mspaulding06(a)gmail.com, tdawson(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
activemq doesn't provide the necessary scripts/config files to start.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0:5.6.0-5.fc19
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install -y activemq activemq-core
2. try starting the service
3. note there is not a service unit
This seems like a fairly major thing to be missing in the packages. Is there
another package or metapackage that needs to be installed for it to work?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IC3tNZ0uDP&a=cc_unsubscribe
7 years, 1 month
[Bug 1021292] New: Transaction check error when upgrading jogl2
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021292
Bug ID: 1021292
Summary: Transaction check error when upgrading jogl2
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: jogl2
Assignee: c.david86(a)gmail.com
Reporter: asaha(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: c.david86(a)gmail.com,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
# rpm -q jogl2
jogl2-2.0-0.11.rc12.fc20.x86_64
# yum -y update jogl2
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package jogl2.x86_64 0:2.0-0.11.rc12.fc20 will be updated
---> Package jogl2.x86_64 0:2.0.2-1.fc20 will be an update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Dependencies Resolved
==============================================================================================================================================================================================
Package Arch
Version Repository
Size
==============================================================================================================================================================================================
Updating:
jogl2 x86_64
2.0.2-1.fc20 updates-testing
4.0 M
Transaction Summary
==============================================================================================================================================================================================
Upgrade 1 Package
Total size: 4.0 M
Downloading packages:
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/doc/jogl2/bouml from install of jogl2-2.0.2-1.fc20.x86_64
conflicts with file from package jogl2-2.0-0.11.rc12.fc20.x86_64
Error Summary
-------------
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Clean ugpgrade
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YU8riko2Sl&a=cc_unsubscribe
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 1008091] New: Building with tycho seems to fail on arm builders
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008091
Bug ID: 1008091
Summary: Building with tycho seems to fail on arm builders
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: tycho
Assignee: rgrunber(a)redhat.com
Reporter: gerard(a)ryan.lt
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kdaniel(a)redhat.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
rgrunber(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I'm trying to build eclipse-jbosstools, but every time that an arm builder is
chosen in koji, the build fails. I'm not sure exactly if the problem is with
tycho, but it looks like it's tycho/maven related.
How reproducible:
It seems to be only on armv7hl. Also, I've only run into the problem on f20,
since that's the only place I seem to have been given arm builders. Incredibly,
on my 4 attempts, the two scratch builds have been done on x86, so then I go to
do a real build, thinking everything is fine, and I get an arm one and it
fails.
Passes:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5933066
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5925100
Failures:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5925234
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5933332
Here's the build.log from one of the failures (I think those get cleared after
a week or so): http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/arm-build.log
Additional info:
I was talking to Dennis Gilmore on #fedora-devel about this, and he mentioned
that if necessary, he can provide access to arm systems to test/debug on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZGobfEfjEs&a=cc_unsubscribe
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 1043158] New: zookeeper-server service silently fails while starting on FC20
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043158
Bug ID: 1043158
Summary: zookeeper-server service silently fails while starting
on FC20
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: zookeeper
Assignee: tstclair(a)redhat.com
Reporter: rudcy(a)broadbandninja.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jeff(a)ocjtech.us, skottler(a)redhat.com,
tstclair(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
zookeeper-server on fc20 silently fails to start after a fresh install
due to unit file precondition on missing file .
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
zookeeper-server-3.4.5-12.fc20.noarch
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Fresh install of fc20
2. install zookeeper-server (and zookeeper?)
3. sudo cp /etc/zoo-sample.cfg /etc/zoo.cfg
4. sudo systemctl start zookeeper
5. journalctl -f shows:
```
Dec 14 14:18:32 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: Started Apache ZooKeeper.
```
Actual results:
The service has aborted when trying to start, the errors it
reported are not logged to the journal nor /var/log/zookeeper/*
Expected results:
the service should be running, or log an error to the journal.
Additional info:
```
% cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/zookeeper.service
...
ConditionPathExists=/var/lib/zookeeper/data/myid
```
Creating /var/lib/zookeeper/data/myid and chowning it over to zookeeper makes
the next restart "stick" and zookeeper then logs to the journal (too verbosely,
btw).
I've found nothing on setting up zookeeper-server on fedora on google,
but I'm new here, I may have missed it.
So no docs on what is myid or what's it for, zookeeper runs fine without
it if it's launched manually.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ItjXVYdpch&a=cc_unsubscribe
7 years, 10 months