On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Johannes Lips <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com>wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Matt Spaulding <mspaulding06(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
> I think you've piqued my interest. I would be willing to help out if you
> still need a co-maintainer.
Well of course, so far no one else stepped up. ;-) Are you already a
packager and have some experience with java packaging?
Yes, I'm a packager and have packaged/reviewed a few java packages (around
20 or so would be my guess).
If yes, then I would be happy to approve your requests for ACL on
package in packagedb.
The main task in the future would be to introduce groovy 2.0.0 into
which will need a considerable amount of work due to the new build system
they are using.
At the moment, all I do is updating the stable 1.8.X branch, so this could
be your first task, since I think they released a new update recently.
Yep, it looks like they have Groovy 2.0.2 out now. Sounds good to me!
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Johannes Lips <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I was the groovy co-maintainer for quite a while now. The problem is
>> that I don't have sufficient time any more to do enough development and
>> work on packages I don't care much about.
>> The original maintainer probably has the same problem and doesn't really
>> care about the package, so I was the only one doing updates etc. in the
>> last couple of months.
>> I would be really glad if someone could step up and co-maintain the
>> package. Otherwise I will release my co-maintainership in a short while.
>> java-devel mailing list
> If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least
> once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things. - Rene
java-devel mailing list