Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Andrew Haley <aph(a)redhat.com>
> Packages should generally be buildable on both. If they're not, they
> can be marked, e.g. as dependent on openjdk.
I've had to do this for a couple of my packages that build fine with
gcj, but whose documentation is not produced in an acceptable manner
by sinjdoc. It doesn't handle javadocs for annotation definitions,
for one thing.
Yes, sinjdoc is rather old. If it doesn't do the job, then you'll have
to mark your package as dependent on openjdk.