* Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> [2010-07-08 16:30]:
On 07/08/2010 02:04 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Java/Maven-specific questions like this should probably be directed to
> java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org first.
>
> Andrew
>
> * Chris Spike<chris.spike(a)arcor.de> [2010-07-08 15:59]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
>> There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
>> JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
>> JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
>> Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
>> JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
>> JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
>> this is up to taste?
>>
It is up to taste I guess. As long as the name follows the rules here,
it will continue to work:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/JPPMavenReadme#POM_file_names
>> Regards, Chris
>>
>> [1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
>> --
Also, it shows:
%add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate
parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
Agreed. It should be something like:
%add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP
%{name}
Cheers,
Deepak
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301
http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel