On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jack Tanner <ihok(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Yes there are precedents; in fact, I found (after starting this
thread) that the geronimo-parent-poms package in F16 contains POMs
related to genesis, but uses the 1.5 POMs rather than 2.0, so the
"flava" POMs aren't included. Could geronimo-parent-poms be updated
to 2.0 ?
And as for apache-parent, somehow even though org.apache:apache is
referenced as a parent in numerous fedora-packaged POMs on my system,
it's not packaged anywhere that I could see. I didn't think the child
POMs were functional without the parent, but I guess I have
misunderstood this. Still, it seems reasonable to have apache-parent
packaged.
--Andy
On 9/2/2011 2:01 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
> The way that the POMs for the apache ecosystem are structured, it
> looks like I'm going to need to package several levels of "parent"
> POMs. Something like:
>
> apache-parent
> genesis-parent
> genesis-default-flava
> genesis-java5-flava
>
> Should each pom be separate, or is there a point at which it makes
> sense to group some set of "apache-parent-poms" together? I can go
> either way with it, but I want to put these up for review fairly soon,
> and didn't want to file a bunch of separate reviews if they should all
> just be bundled in a single package.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --Andy
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
>
>
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel