On 08/10/2010 11:10 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
>
> The sensible rule everyone seems to use is that if adding gcj support
> doesn't require much effort, add it. If not, don't.
As gcj is at 1.5 JVM level there is no point in having gcj support for
packages that require Java 1.6.
Yes, obviously. I don't quite understand the point you're making,
though: clearly if a package requires 1.6 then adding gcj support
requires much effort, so don't add it.
Andrew.