On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 17:57 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
* Tom Tromey <tromey(a)redhat.com> [2005-05-18 17:54]:
> Anthony ran into some problem where oprofile was finding the wrong
> symbols. He upgraded and this was fixed. I don't know what versions
> are affected.
I ran CVS head opreport as Anthony suggested (he said opcontrol was fine to
use with the binary in FC4's package).
Can you triple check that? When I run opreport from FC4 I get the same
goofy looking report you do for this task (with
java.lang.Compiler.Compiler, etc). But when I run the opreport I built
from oprofile cvs sources I get a really believable report where
everything appears to make sense.
AG