I'd like to get some kind of consensus on naming of the spring/springframework packages. We have some of both:
spring-ldap-javadoc.noarch spring-ldap.noarch spring-maps-default.noarch spring-retry-javadoc.noarch spring-retry.noarch springframework-aop.noarch springframework-beans.noarch springframework-context-support.noarch springframework-context.noarch springframework-expression.noarch springframework-instrument.noarch springframework-javadoc.noarch springframework-jdbc.noarch springframework-jms.noarch springframework-orm.noarch springframework-oxm.noarch springframework-security-javadoc.noarch springframework-security.noarch springframework-struts.noarch springframework-tx.noarch springframework-web.noarch springframework-webmvc-portlet.noarch springframework-webmvc.noarch springframework.noarch
The core/parent package is currently "springframework", but one could argue it should be called "spring-framework".
I think the spring-* names more closely match current upstream. However, "spring" itself is:
Name : spring Arch : x86_64 Version : 94.1 Release : 3.fc19 Size : 16 M Repo : updates/19/x86_64 Summary : Multiplayer, 3D realtime strategy combat game URL : http://springrts.com License : GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2 and GFDL and (GFDL or CC-BY) Description : Spring is a project aiming to create a new, versatile, full 3D Real Time : Strategy Engine. : Spring is designed to be played as online multiplayer matches, but some AI are : also available to play against the computer. : Please read the README.Fedora file to get started. The Spring wiki is also a : great resource, read it here: http://spring.clan-sy.com/wiki/Main_Page
and spring-installer is a helper program for spring.
springframework-* seems to have been what is most commonly used and probably what we should standardize on?