* Patrice Dumas <pertusus(a)free.fr> [2007-10-15 09:03]:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:11:40AM -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * David Walluck <david(a)zarb.org> [2007-10-15 07:29]:
> > Also, jpackage-utils should be required by the eclipse package regardless.
>
> Why? Some of its dependencies Require it so it'll be brought in. Is
> there an advantage to requiring it explicitly?
The dependency chain is not obvious to me, it seems to be through
java-1.5.0-gcj. If I am not wrong, it seems to me that a direct Requires
would be better.
I really don't care, so if people want to see that explicit Requires,
feel free to add it to the package in CVS or send me a patch.
Andrew