----- "Kevin Fenzi" <
kevin@scrye.com> wrote:
>
> I would rephase that as: "who can nominate someone as a #fedora op".
> Should we allow self nominations?
> Should it be only any existing #fedora op?
> Should it be more than one existing #fedora op?
>
> We can add this to the meeting next week...
>
This is a simple effort it would appear to eliminate a few ops from having a voice because I am willing to be a "trouble maker" or "asshole" or "dink" or "troll" or "illogical", these are the names I have been called since this issue and the #fedora users I choose to nominate have come up. I am not sorry that I feel those that are perhaps not the "favorite sons" may be good ops and good to have involved in establishing the ops feedback process. I do not feel that we should be adding ops mid stream of that task, this should not however prevent us from aligning added ops for once that process is complete.