Previously, the PHX2 facility has had one ISCSI partition that was mounted on multiple xen/kvm servers to allow for boxes to be moved from one server to another when needed. This worked for in our original PHX1 facility, but the new netapp can be configured in more ways and the storage admins have recommended we split up our storage into smaller "containers" to help deal with possible performance and continuity of service issues.
Old partition: xenGuests New partitions: virtWebGuests virtBuildGuests
currently on xenGuests the following partititons and guests live: compose-x86-02 xenGuests -wi-a- 300.00g cvs-storage xenGuests -wi-a- 300.00g cvs1 xenGuests -wi-a- 75.00g cvs2 xenGuests -wi-a- 15.00g koji2 xenGuests -wi-a- 10.00g nfs01 xenGuests -wi-a- 10.00g pkgs01 xenGuests owi-a- 75.00g relepel01 xenGuests -wi-a- 30.00g relepel1-old xenGuests -wi-a- 30.00g sign-bridge01 xenGuests -wi-a- 30.00g ns04 xenGuests -wi-a- 15.00g db02 xenGuests -wi-a- 75.00g
we would rebuild/move ns04 and db02 over to virtWebGuests
and the other boxes would be rebuilt as needed on the virtBuildGuests share. [We can also create more shares for the build network.]
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:18 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Previously, the PHX2 facility has had one ISCSI partition that was mounted on multiple xen/kvm servers to allow for boxes to be moved from one server to another when needed. This worked for in our original PHX1 facility, but the new netapp can be configured in more ways and the storage admins have recommended we split up our storage into smaller "containers" to help deal with possible performance and continuity of service issues.
Old partition: xenGuests New partitions: virtWebGuests virtBuildGuests
currently on xenGuests the following partititons and guests live: compose-x86-02 xenGuests -wi-a- 300.00g cvs-storage xenGuests -wi-a- 300.00g cvs1 xenGuests -wi-a- 75.00g cvs2 xenGuests -wi-a- 15.00g koji2 xenGuests -wi-a- 10.00g nfs01 xenGuests -wi-a- 10.00g pkgs01 xenGuests owi-a- 75.00g relepel01 xenGuests -wi-a- 30.00g relepel1-old xenGuests -wi-a- 30.00g sign-bridge01 xenGuests -wi-a- 30.00g ns04 xenGuests -wi-a- 15.00g db02 xenGuests -wi-a- 75.00g
we would rebuild/move ns04 and db02 over to virtWebGuests
and the other boxes would be rebuilt as needed on the virtBuildGuests share. [We can also create more shares for the build network.]
hey, just saw this and I'm a bit confused by the naming.
virtBuildGuests I get - b/c they are build-related - but virtWeb?
-sv
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:29, seth vidal skvidal@fedoraproject.org wrote:
hey, just saw this and I'm a bit confused by the naming.
virtBuildGuests I get - b/c they are build-related - but virtWeb?
Well our network is split into two sets of things:
Build systems and MostlyWebHostsButSomeOtherStuffToo.
that seemed a bit long but I really didn't like calling it "Production" since well uhm build boxes are production also.
-sv
infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:34:42 -0600 Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 08:29, seth vidal skvidal@fedoraproject.org wrote:
hey, just saw this and I'm a bit confused by the naming.
virtBuildGuests I get - b/c they are build-related - but virtWeb?
Well our network is split into two sets of things:
Build systems and MostlyWebHostsButSomeOtherStuffToo.
that seemed a bit long but I really didn't like calling it "Production" since well uhm build boxes are production also.
Perhaps we should just change it to 'VirtGuests' ?
kevin
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Kevin Fenzi -
Seth Vidal -
Stephen John Smoogen