On Fri, 29 May 2009, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
+1 for 1
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an
> x86_64 box. We have two options.
> 1) double it's ram
> 2) rebuild it as x86
> I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and we've generally got
> time for it. The concern is the boxes are tuned for i686 with 4G of ram
> and don't generally like to operate if either of those change.
I should note that if we do 1) it'd only be until after the release at
which time 2 would be done.