On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Jon Stanley wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com>
> >> > Anyone out there with experience and are inclined to get this in
> >> > Is this something that would be better on one of our collab servers or
> >> > does it actually have to integrate with hosted somehow?
> >> No experience but AIUI it integrates somehow w/mailman. I share your
> >> concerns about load. The party that wanted it just got it packaged a
> >> few days ago for Fedora, and has a build working on RHEL5
> > Lets confirm that since it'll have an impact on possible decisions.
> If it integrates with mailman.. should it be on collab1 versus hosted1?
Well, for us that's where things get a little messy. We generally keep
fedorahosted as it's own modular system so we can move it or do whatever
with it. So it has its own mailman setup. I assume it requires local
read access to MM or does it do it via some MM api that I'm not aware of?
Duh I feel silly.. I saw that lists.fedorahosted.org
was at collab and
thought the mailman was there.. duh.
[ssmoogen@bakeneko ~]$ host lists.fedoraproject.org
has address 18.104.22.168
mail is handled by 10 lists.fedoraproject.org
[ssmoogen@bakeneko ~]$ host 22.214.171.124
126.96.36.199.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer collab1.fedoraproject.org
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning