On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 02:52:16PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
On 12/30/2014 02:45 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 08:46:54AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
>>On 12/29/2014 05:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>>On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
>>>>Dear sysadmin-cvs group,
>>>> I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs group
>>>>they found script process-git-requests is not working for them and
>>>>believe only limb knows how to run it. I see this is not good. We should
>>>>have then new way of using process-git-requests documented somewhere. I
>>>>not sure if the new way of usage is updated here.
>>>> We already have less people working for this group and I guess
>>>>limb no one gets success with that script. Please update somewhere the
>>>>so that when we need, other members can help needed people with their
>>>Having work with this script a little lately, I would be happy to try to help
>>>I can be provided with some sort of backtrace.
>>>Also, please note that this script should disappear in the coming month in
>>>of pkgdb-admin (part of packagedb-cli) with the new package and branch
>>>moved from bugzilla to pkgdb (see )
>> Looks like still we can't automate new package requests based on the
>>like user raised fedora-cvs? flag and bugzilla comment found valid (after
>>parsing all needed fields).
>I am not sure to understand what you mean, could you rephrase or expand a
Sure I mean any script that daily checks if any bugzilla got fedora-cvs?
flag and then check the bugzilla comments or some pre-decided way like
putting only SCM request in last comment and parsing it. If found valid then
process branching request else set fedora-cvs- flag.
In simple words no human is required for processing this request.
I believe Dennis still wants it to be a human-based process.
We could automatically treat (and we will in pkgdb) requests for Fedora branches,
but it is trickier for EPEL.