Hi Jean-Baptiste, please see my comments inline.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft <
Le 2016-10-11 08:04, Alex Eng a écrit :
> I'm not sure what you mean by "create policy page"? Do we have policy
> page that I'm not aware of?
> and remove it from fedora.zanata.org
? Remove which page from
English native doing that to evade the subject...
Not sure what is being implied here, but Alex is genuinely not aware of
what you meant here, and neither was I until you clarified it was the
Let's rewrite it :
Well, thank you for your answer:
* can you create a dedicated Zanata Policy page ?
We already did this, and it's the one you see at the moment. You however
pointed out it doesn't align with Fedora policy. It can be changed by any
admin in the system when a new url is provided. We have admin rights in the
system, but we'd prefer if these changes were done by a Fedora l10n admin
(e.g. Noriko) as this is their responsibility and they have stated they
prefer all changes to go through them. I also imagine there needs to be
some discussion about any such changes with the community as a whole.
* can you remove Piwiki script from Fedora.Zanata.org
Same thing here. It can be done, but please have one of the l10n admins
take care of the change. In this particular case I would really urge the
community to consider keeping the setting as it provides the development
team valuable information about how Zanata is being used. But alas if this
goes against policy then we will just have to make due.
To answer your question, I'm surprised you do not know you have a terms
page using RedHat policy page: http://zanata.org/terms
Let me quote the content:
12. Privacy Statement
> Red Hat agrees to use your personal information in accordance with the
> Terms. In the event of any conflict between these Terms and the Red Hat
either. It is done for a website browsing usage and not for collaborative
I'm sad to notice mailing list guidelines are not respected either :
Please respect https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/PrivacyPolicy
I'm curious as to which part of the mailing list guidelines you feel is not
being respected by Zanata. Would you care to elaborate?
Values are important, it's what make us work together, gathering every
information we can about user is not something we should encourage.
Agreed on values. We are happy to help wherever we can, but please
understand Zanata is in no way attempting to 'gather every information'
about its users. Whatever information it tracks is akin to system logs, to
be used to analyze and improve the platform. But like I said before, the
community can elect to opt out of this, and the admins have the capability
to do it.
Please notice it hurt to see you set the statistics you want as a
developpement team, while you do not set the statistics we need to help
Language Coordination in Zanata.
Not sure I understand your point here. Do you wish to see some of the piwik
statistics which could help with language coordination? If so, we would be
happy to share those with the community.
Or, are you talking about new features in Zanata for the same purpose?
Furthermore, should we move this thread to the l10n mailing list and out of
the Infra one?
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fed