Hi,
Over the past few days, I've come across two questions where the asker was on rawhide. While I'd like to help these people, rawhide is way too quick and sometimes way too buggy - Ask Fedora is probably not the best place for these questions just like #fedora isn't - the Q&A mailing list is. Should we add a policy that says we will not deal with rawhide issues on Ask Fedora in general, and that people should head to the Q&A mailing list?
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/50379/fedora-21-rawhide-failed/
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/50414/gnome-software-3133-shows-no...
On Jul 16, 2014 6:38 PM, "Ankur Sinha" sanjay.ankur@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Over the past few days, I've come across two questions where the asker was on rawhide. While I'd like to help these people, rawhide is way too quick and sometimes way too buggy - Ask Fedora is probably not the best place for these questions just like #fedora isn't - the Q&A mailing list is. Should we add a policy that says we will not deal with rawhide issues on Ask Fedora in general, and that people should head to the Q&A mailing list?
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/50379/fedora-21-rawhide-failed/
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/50414/gnome-software-3133-shows-no...
-- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD)
IIRC, the general policy on the users@ list is to refer to qa@ until after Beta release. That seems sensible for ask.fp.o as well.
--Pete
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 19:08 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
IIRC, the general policy on the users@ list is to refer to qa@ until after Beta release. That seems sensible for ask.fp.o as well.
I thought so too. I've added a question to tackle this: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/50428/sticky-can-i-ask-questions-r...
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org