On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 06:34:15PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:35:58PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:18:32PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > It would be nice if we would implement "approval" system while doing
> > this. Like if you set somebody as override, that person must click
> > "accept". Same way to change it, the old person must click
> I'm trying to think how this would work for groups and pseudo users.
> For the later this should work fine, except that potentially several people
> would receive the confirmation link.
> For the former, it's bit more tricky but it would be one way where we could
> ensure that the group is correctly set-up in FAS (with an mailing list address).
> It's a bit more work than anticipated though, but should be doable.
Thinking some more about this and while I think we should aim for this process,
considering the gain we would have from just moving away from
fedora-scm-requests (nicer UX, easier sync to bugzilla of the information, no
need to clone that large git repo). Would we be ok with a phased release where
at first one the main admin (and infra/releng) would be able to the set the
I think that would be fine and a definite improvement.
From there we could see if we need this approval system and if we do, who can
trigger changing it.
Sounds good to me.