Jon Stanley wrote:
Well they haven't been interested for quite some time, I think
they've finally come to realize that gitweb as is is crap.
But John made an interesting point to me at FUDCon that might be
disincentive for upstream to accept this: "there are probably 20
people in the world that need this code, and I know 15 of them" :)
My take from reading the review of the patches on the git list is that
they would be accepted, but they need to be done in a way that doesn't
negatively impact those who don't want/need the caching.
The git folks are often pretty hard on patch reviews, but I think that
results in better, more maintainable code in git.git. :)
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL:
www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Men have become the tools of their tools.
-- Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)