On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:59:32AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:57:22 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 04:59:29PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:19:36 +0100
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > That's not currently there, I do think people @mentioned in a
> > > ticket should be added, but it's not there yet. As for batch or
> > > CC'ing a group, it'd be a second stage.
> > >
> > > I added a ticket to trac the @mention question :
> > >
https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/690
> >
> > ok.
> >
> > The always cc/bcc thing gets used by a lot of trac's where some
> > group of people always want to get all traffic. For example, I get
> > all infrastructure trac ticket changes and it's very handy to keep
> > track of whats being updated.
>
> Oh we can easily do that with FMN: Get all the notification about the
> project `foo` or the projects tagged `bar`. That's even how we do the
> notifications on #fedora-apps
Sure, although how do we handle 'private/sensitive' issues?
Project admins get notifications for everything happening in their projects,
which I realize now is even better than the FMN approach I described above :)
...snip...
> > Oh, I just thought of one other thing: rss feeds? For
issues, prs,
> > etc?
> >
> > In fact that could possibly take the place of always cc/bcc
> > (although rss feeds likely wouldn't have the private/sensitive
> > tickets perhaps).
> >
> > Some of our trac instances use rss to update via zodbot to irc.
>
> Hm, I guess this should be a doable, would the rss feed have only the
> tickets created or also the comments on tickets?
Seperate feeds I would say... one for ticket status (created, closed,
add tag) and one for comments? Or take the bodhi approach and make
everything seperate rss feeds. ;)
We should make a ticket of this :)
Pierre