On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> > On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > > Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or
> > > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow
> > > to help if needed.
> > If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at
> > admin.fedoraproject.org
so that it can share cookies with our other
> > applications.
> it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm
> fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/
for stuff. But if this is
> an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite
Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted
at end users.
Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything
from our repos and such?