> then never visit the place much less listen to feedback offered? It is
> clearly stated at the Fedora forums that contributors never visit there
> because so many arrive on their shores with the false hope of actually
> giving feedback.
>
>
>
> 2011/3/2 "Jóhann B. Guđmundsson" <
johannbg@gmail.com>
>>
>> As Brian mentioned in [1],[2] as in the CWG wanted to get a constructive
>> feedback on COC and COCE proposed drafts from the whole community on the
>> FAB list highlights one issue that the project is facing as in we don't
>> have a good way of gathering community feedback on topics.
>>
>> This issue is probably know but for some reason not being worked upon?
>> ( Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong )
>>
>> Anyway to point out the obvious encase nobody was aware of this issue.
>> ( we have been without one for now about 15 release cycles so something
>> is amiss )
>>
>> He posts the proposed drafts to a single mailing list which..
>>
>> a)
>> Has a limited number of users subscribed to it
>>
>> b)
>> Requires all members of the community to be subscribed to that
>> particular list.
>>
>> c)
>> Mailing list provide the ability to see and reply to others people feed
>> back resulting in so called *noise* as in people reassuring their
>> feedback encase the message/meaning did get through and etc.. rather
>> then constructive discussion.
>>
>> That results in an end result that is far from being effective and
>> reaching the whole community.
>>
>> Coming up with a rough solution to gather the feedback is a no brainer
>>
>> First we need a common dominator that applies to all community members
>> and that one is obvious FAS account.
>>
>> Next we need a web server with a DB backend, hooked up to FAS with an
>> simple web page that the community member logs into that displays to him
>> what he needs to provide his feedback and two text boxes one for the
>> feedback and another one for any question he might have with regards to
>> the proposal/draft itself.
>>
>> With the above in place all that is needed is to request the feedback
>> via our public channels like a mail to the announce or something similar.
>>
>> Now the tricky part is coming up with a simple yet scalable to the total
>> number of community members solution, to work through all that feedback
>> I got couple of ideas up my sleeves for that but instead of reinventing
>> the wheel I propose that existing survey tools like [1],[2] be looked at
>> first to see how they have solved the problem we are facing.
>>
>> JBG
>>
>> 1.
>>
>>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2011-March/010525.html
>> 2.
>>
>>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2011-March/010526.html
>> 3.
http://www.limesurvey.org/
>> 4.
http://www.doodle.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> infrastructure mailing list
>>
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
>
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>